When it comes to drain fields for septic systems in Florida, there are two main options: chamber drainfields and aerobic drip lines. Both have their own set of advantages and disadvantages, and the best option will depend on the specific needs and circumstances of each individual property.
A chamber drainfield, also known as a mound system, is a type of drainfield that uses plastic chambers to create an elevated area for the effluent to be dispersed into the soil. The chambers are connected together in a series to form a drainfield. The effluent flows into the chambers and is then dispersed into the surrounding soil.
One of the main advantages of a chamber drainfield is that it can be installed in areas with poor soil conditions or high water tables. The elevated design allows for better drainage and reduces the risk of failure. Additionally, chamber drainfields require minimal maintenance and can last for several decades.
However, chamber drainfields have some drawbacks. They are more expensive to install than other types of drainfields and can be more difficult to install in certain areas. They also take up more space than other types of drainfields and may not be a good option for properties with limited space.
An aerobic drip line, on the other hand, is a type of drainfield that uses a drip irrigation system to disperse the effluent into the soil. The effluent is pumped from the aeration unit to a series of perforated pipes, called a drip line, which are buried in the soil. The effluent then flows out of the pipes and is dispersed into the surrounding soil.
One of the main advantages of an aerobic drip line is that it is a more compact option than chamber drainfields and can be a good option for properties with limited space. They also require less maintenance than chamber drainfields and can be more cost-effective over time.
However, aerobic drip lines have some drawbacks. They are not as effective in areas with poor soil conditions or high water tables and are more prone to failure in those conditions. They also require more maintenance than traditional drainfields and need to be serviced regularly to ensure that they are functioning properly.
In conclusion, both chamber drainfields and aerobic drip lines have their own set of advantages and disadvantages in Florida. Chamber drainfields are more durable, can handle poorly soil and high water table but are more expensive and take more space. Aerobic drip lines are more cost-effective and space-saving but can be less effective in certain conditions. It’s always best to consult with a professional engineer or septic contractor to determine the best option for your property.